The question boils down to deciphering the US Citizen petitioner's residence. In order to file an immigrant visa petition at USCIS Bangkok administrative rules require that the US Citizen petitioner be resident in Thailand for at least one year on a long term visa (Thai permanent residence, Non-immigrant B, O, ED, etc.). Many petitioners find filing the USCIS petition to be advantageous because the processing time can be expedited by as much as 6 months.
Should the I-130 petition receive approval from the Bangkok District office of USCIS, then it will be forwarded to the US Embassy. In order to obtain the visa on behalf of the alien loved one the US Citizen Petitioner will need to file an I-864 affidavit of support showing that the petitioner can support the alien beneficiary at 125% of the poverty level. An issue arises because the US Citizen Petitioner needs a domicile in the United States in order to file the I-864. Under the US Immigration and Nationality Act, in order to have a domicile in the USA, one must have a legal residence in the USA. A legal residence requires an actual abode or dwelling. For the American expat living abroad, proving that a dwelling exists in the USA can be challenging particularly where a person has failed to maintain their residence.
IS it possible for a petitioner to be domiciled in the United States if he does not retain a residence there? There exists an innate inconsistency when a US Citizen residing in Thailand files a USCIS petition in Thailand because by filing in Thailand the petitioner is acknowledging that his residence is outside of the US. However, at the Affidavit of Support phase, to establish domicile, petitioner will need a US residence.
The US Foreign Service has recognized this "disconnect." In order to square this circle the FAM (Foreign Affairs Manual) gives a foreign service officer the authority to accept an I-864 affidavit of support where the petitioner has taken affirmative steps to terminate his or her domicile in Thailand (or other foreign country), and has taken further affirmative steps to reestablish domicile in the United States. This administrative rule should not be inferred to imply that there is not an intrinsic contradiction between the residence requirements at each phase of the process. Instead, it merely gives consular officers guidance about what to do in cases where this type of situation arises.
(The information imparted herein is meant for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for personalized legal advice. No Lawyer-Client relationship is created by reading this article.)
Source
0 comments:
Post a Comment